Latest Documents

Latest Posts

Factors that may be considered by SLA in granting liquor licenses do not include whether there will be patron dancing, live music, or amplified music
The 500 Foot Law ABC § 64 in practice creates barriers to obtaining an on-Premises license without an optional time consuming hearing by the SLA Board, absent Community Board Approval.
New York Consolidated Laws, Alcoholic Beverage Control Law – ABC § 64. License to sell liquor at retail for consumption on the premises with 500 Foot Law.
SLA data shows that Live Music is explicitly or implicitly disallowed in over 9000 of the 11,000 NYC licenses; only 278 licenses allow patron dancing.
A recent stipulation for an owner seekinga liquor license in Mid-Town is a case study of the process of obtaining a liquor license for a live jazz club.
Alan D. Sugarman submitted this comment in response to an oversimplified article appearing in CityLand. The article ignores abusive regulation of dancing and music by the State Liquor Authority, with Community Boards, requiring licensees to comply with an approved Method …
Community Board Stipulation often provide provisions such as “I will not apply for an alteration to the method of operation or for any physical alterations of any nature without first coming before CB 3”
The New York City Community Boards in cooperation with the State Liquor Authority have ignored the decisions of Chiasson I and Chiasson II in in  1986 and 1988, implementing restrictions against live music declared as unconstitutional. Although the City amended …
Guide to license databases of the New York State Liquor Authority.

The Mayor has narrowly defined the problem and the need to change zoning regulation of dancing and music. This is a narrow view of the problem. The problem is the need to eliminate the arbitrary regulation of dancing and music, whether by the DCP or any other governmental entity. The most important regulators restricting dancing and music are Community Boards with the State Liquor Authority.  The Mayor and City Council have narrowly defined  the scope of the problem, so that they may claim significant success when the zoning amendments are approved. This was the tactic in  2017 when the Cabaret Law was repealed, with no significant impact on increasing dancing in New York City, despite every expert stating that the repeal was largely irrelevant because of both zoning and SLA regulation. Deja vu.

 

May 2023 City of Yes Proposal 8
The SLA banning banning advertised, ticketed live music events during Covid violated the First Amendment rights of the an establishment which coordinates and contracts with venues, including those within New York State, to offer, advertise, and perform at live musical …
Letters 2022-2025 to SLA Chairs Bradley and Chan